PragerU 2: Why Girls Become Boys
Written By: Andy Kovaleski | May 1, 2021
Transphobia is nothing new, but the forerunners of the warped ideology come and go. Recently, PragerU has played a significant role in its perpetuation. On March 29, 2021 PragerU teamed up with Abigail Shrier, the author of the book Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters. She has been a strict advocate for legal reform against transgender people, especially young trans men.
This article will delve into the arguments made by Abigail Shrier in the PragerU video titled “Why Girls Become Boys.” Which is just as poorly researched and transphobic as her book. Both are also no more than thinly veiled attempts to spread transphobia directly into homes that include young trans people, putting them at risk and possibly removing the most important support system they have. If you are interested in Abigail Shrier herself and the controversy surrounding her book, I would recommend listening to Ty Turner’s discussion. They are one of the trans people Shrier used to further her own agenda, yet she never informed them that they would be part of this book (Turner; Shrier, 2020). In this article, however, I will be looking into the specifics of her claims to fully explain their falsehood. The first assertion is that more young people, especially young girls, than ever before are trans, and that there are some clear reasons why.
It is certainly true that more people are being diagnosed or identifying as transgender as there has been a steady increase since 2002 with a spike in 2006 (Briefing; Dhejne). This is widely attributed to the growing acceptance of transgender people and the broadening of the definitions of gender dysphoria and gender in general. This does mean that more trans people are out and proud lately, but it doesn’t mean that there are more trans people now than there were in 2002, or at any point before that. When Abigail Shrier says “if you graduated high school over a decade ago, it was unlikely that you knew anyone who was transgender,” she is simply incorrect. You may not have known that they were trans because it is unlikely they were out at that time, but that does not change the fact that they are just as trans as those today who are out at that age. Shrier further claims that this is “because, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the condition [gender dysphoria] underlying it [being transgender] afflicted roughly 1 in 10,000 people, or .01% of the population.” Today, this number has jumped all the way up to 0.6%. Even today, less than 1% of the population is diagnosed with gender dysphoria (Briefing; Dhejne).
PragerU also alleges that before 2012 there was no scientific or medical literature about assigned female at birth (afab) adolescents who wanted to transition. It also says that gender dysphoria “suddenly began affecting…girls” in the last decade. A simple search on Google Scholar provided me with scientific literature from 1993 and earlier discussing afab trans people, including teens. Not only is this incredibly easy to disprove, but it also has no real relevance to the topic Shrier is talking about. To draw a comparison, before the 2000s there was no research on heart attacks in women, and by extension afab trans people, therefore very few heart attacks were diagnosed in afab people (Nedelman). Does that mean that cis women and afab trans people didn’t have heart attacks until 2000? Or that there was a sudden increase in heart attacks in 2000? Personally, I think it’s more likely that science was unwilling to study afab bodies before that.
Gender dysphoria is defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) as
A strong and persistent cross-gender identification (not merely a desire for any perceived cultural advantages of being the other sex). In children, the disturbance is manifested by four (or more) of the following:
repeatedly stated desire to be, or insistence that he or she is, the other sex
in boys, preference for cross-dressing or simulating female attire; in girls, insistence on wearing only stereotypical masculine clothing
strong and persistent preferences for cross-sex roles in make-believe play or persistent fantasies of being the other sex
intense desire to participate in the stereotypical games and pastimes of the other sex
strong preference for playmates of the other sex
Persistent discomfort with his or her sex or sense of inappropriateness in the gender role of that sex.
The disturbance is not concurrent with a physical intersex condition.
The disturbance causes clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.